| Home Page | Council Newsroom | Site Map | http://cornwall-council.custhelp.com/app/answers/list | Website - information and help | Feedback form | Legal Information | Access Keys | County Museums |
Skip Nav

             

You are here: Home Page> Council and democracy> Council Newsroom> Media Releases> News from 2011> News from November 2011> Water quality survey highlights the value of monitoring private water supplies

Water quality survey highlights the value of monitoring private water supplies

Last updated: 02/11/2011 Add to My Bookmarks Subscribe

A survey of private water supplies serving 258 homes in East Cornwall has confirmed that the geology of Cornwall which is widely known through its history of mining activities, has contributed, along with plumbing derived substances, to an increased level of metals and minerals present in some private drinking water supplies. 

The survey, undertaken earlier this year by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) in collaboration with Cornwall Council and the British Geological Survey (BGS), found that the majority of supplies which were analysed for a broad range of metals and minerals, including aluminium, antimony, arsenic, copper, fluoride, iron, lead, manganese, nickel and nitrates, met standards set by the Private Water Supplies Regulations 2009.  

For more than two thirds of the supplies tested, householders will have received a results letter from the study team explaining that no further action is required.  In the remaining cases, where a water sample has exceeded the standard, householders have been given a results letter with specific advice about next steps and health information.

The standards, known as the prescribed concentrations or values (PCVs), are set to protect public health or prevent the taste or smell of the water being affected or the water causing staining to laundry, sinks and baths. In 16 cases where the private water supplies were found to have elevated levels of lead and arsenic, householders are being advised to consider re-sampling, replacing plumbing, installing treatment or using an alternative water supply.

Graham Martin from Cornwall Council’s Environmental Health team said: “It is important that the health risks are seen in context and for householders to have all the facts before making a decision about any action. New private water supply regulations which came into force in 2009 place a responsibility on all local councils to complete an assessment of the risks to the quality of private drinking water supplies in their areas by January 2015.

This study is not just important for the households taking part; it has a wider long term aim for the remainder of Cornwall. Thanks to this survey we hope to predict the areas where it would be prudent to test for substances that our past testing, so far, has not included; nickel and arsenic for example.  This in turn will allow householders, and the Council, to assess the potential risks and to decide if there’s a need to test in the future for another parameter.

This survey focussed on metals and minerals but microbiological contamination remains an important public health risk in private supplies.

We will be offering advice on testing or re testing to owners, occupiers, landlords or other persons who are responsible for a private water supply.  In the few cases where the exceedence is in a supply which is either a large one or is used for commercial purposes then we will have to investigate further to determine the most appropriate course of action.”

Dr Jill Meara, Deputy Director of the HPA’s Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, said: “We appreciate that where substances such as arsenic and lead are found in higher levels in private water drinking supplies, it can cause alarm. The HPA is advising Cornwall Council on the health implications of these findings. It is for the council to take forward any further actions to protect the householders' health”.

Story posted 02 November 2011

My area

A-Z of services

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

My Bookmarks

Rate this page

Did you find this page useful?
Please rate:
  • Not at all
  • Not very Not very
  • Quite Quite Quite
  • Very Very Very Very
Before you leave